JOURNAL MENU
GENERAL
FOR AUTHORS
EDITORIAL & REVIEW
PUBLICATION ETHICS
ACCESS
POST-PUBLICATION
Paraskevi Journal of Economics and Management Sciences (PJEMS) publishes original scholarly research in economics, management sciences, business, finance, accounting, entrepreneurship, development studies, public policy, organizational studies, and related interdisciplinary fields.
The journal welcomes theoretical, empirical, methodological, conceptual, and applied research that makes a meaningful contribution to knowledge.
PJEMS considers the following types of scholarly contributions:
The Editor-in-Chief may consider other manuscript types where they make a substantial scholarly contribution.
Manuscripts submitted to PJEMS must be original.
By submitting a manuscript, authors confirm that:
Simultaneous submission of substantially the same manuscript to multiple journals is not permitted.
Research articles should normally follow a logical academic structure appropriate to the discipline.
A typical research article may contain:
The appropriate structure may differ for conceptual papers, review articles, case studies, and other manuscript types.
The title should be:
Avoid unnecessary abbreviations and excessively long titles.
The title page should provide:
Authors should ensure that names and affiliations are accurately presented because these details form part of the permanent scholarly record.
Authorship should reflect substantial intellectual contribution to the research and manuscript.
Authors should not include individuals who have not made an appropriate contribution merely because of seniority, institutional position, friendship, funding, or other non-scholarly considerations.
PJEMS does not support:
All authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.
The journal may request an Author Contribution Statement where appropriate. COPE recommends that journals clearly state authorship and contributorship requirements and provide mechanisms for handling authorship disputes.
The abstract should provide a concise summary of the manuscript.
For original research articles, the abstract should normally indicate:
The abstract should normally be approximately 150–300 words, unless a different format is specified for a particular manuscript type.
Authors should provide approximately 4–8 keywords that accurately represent the main subjects, concepts, methods, and themes of the manuscript.
Keywords should avoid unnecessary repetition of words already appearing in the title.
The introduction should establish:
The literature review should demonstrate appropriate engagement with relevant scholarly literature.
Authors should:
References should accurately support the claims for which they are cited.
The methodology should provide sufficient information for readers and reviewers to understand how the study was conducted.
Depending on the research design, this may include:
Authors should report methodological limitations honestly.
Results should be presented clearly and objectively.
Authors should distinguish between:
Tables and figures should be used where they improve clarity and should not unnecessarily duplicate information presented in the text.
All tables and figures must:
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce copyrighted material where required.
Authors must ensure that references are:
Every source cited in the manuscript should appear in the reference list, and every reference listed should be cited in the manuscript.
Authors should provide DOI information where available.
Fabricated references and citation manipulation are unacceptable.
Where applicable, authors must obtain appropriate ethical approval before conducting research involving human participants or other ethically sensitive activities.
Manuscripts should provide appropriate information concerning:
Research involving personal or confidential information must comply with applicable ethical and legal requirements.
Authors should provide a Data Availability Statement where applicable.
For example:
Data Availability Statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Where data cannot be shared because of privacy, confidentiality, contractual, ethical, or legal restrictions, the authors should clearly explain the applicable restrictions.
Authors should disclose financial or institutional support received for the research.
Where applicable, the statement should identify the funding organization and relevant grant information.
Where no external funding was received, authors may state:
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Authors must disclose relevant actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest.
Where no conflict exists, authors may state:
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Authors may use AI-assisted technologies for appropriate research-support activities, including language improvement, translation, coding, formatting, and other legitimate purposes.
However:
COPE states that AI tools cannot meet authorship requirements because they cannot take responsibility for the submitted work.
Manuscripts may be screened for plagiarism or inappropriate text reuse.
A similarity score alone does not establish plagiarism. The editorial team may assess the source, context, and nature of identified similarities.
Suspected plagiarism or other forms of misconduct may result in rejection or investigation.
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts do not infringe third-party intellectual-property rights.
Where copyrighted tables, figures, images, instruments, or substantial quotations are reproduced, authors must obtain permission where required.
Copyright and licensing arrangements are governed by the journal's Copyright and Licensing Policy.
Manuscripts should be written in clear, professional academic English.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that manuscripts are appropriately edited for:
Manuscripts that meet the journal's initial requirements may undergo external peer review.
PJEMS normally operates a double-anonymous peer-review process.
The peer-review process is described in detail on the journal's Peer Review Process page.
By submitting a manuscript, authors agree to:
Manuscripts should be submitted electronically through the Paraskevi Journal of Economics and Management Sciences (PJEMS) online submission system.
Authors should create an account on the journal website before initiating a submission.
The online submission process is designed to collect the information required for editorial assessment and peer review.
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should ensure that:
COPE recommends that submission systems collect relevant authorship, funding, competing-interest, copyright-permission, and exclusive-submission declarations.
Depending on the manuscript and the journal's review configuration, authors may be required to submit the following files.
The main manuscript should contain the scholarly content of the paper.
Where double-anonymous review is used, identifying information should be removed from the review manuscript.
The title page should contain:
Where applicable, authors may submit:
During submission, authors may be asked to provide:
Providing reviewer suggestions does not guarantee that those individuals will be selected.
Before completing submission, the corresponding author must confirm that:
The manuscript is original, has not been published previously, is not currently under consideration by another journal, and has been approved for submission by all listed authors.
The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors are aware of and approve the submission.
Authors may provide a cover letter containing:
A cover letter should not contain exaggerated claims regarding the importance or novelty of the research.
After submission, the editorial office conducts an initial assessment.
The manuscript may be checked for:
Manuscripts that do not meet essential requirements may be returned to the authors for correction or declined before external review.
Manuscripts that pass initial editorial assessment may be sent to independent reviewers.
PJEMS normally uses double-anonymous peer review.
Authors should ensure that identifying information is removed from the anonymized manuscript where required.
The full process is described in the journal's Peer Review Process policy.
If revisions are requested, authors should submit:
The response should identify how each substantive comment has been addressed.
Where the authors disagree with a reviewer, they should provide a clear scholarly explanation.
Acceptance is based on the editorial and peer-review process.
Submission does not guarantee acceptance.
Payment of an Article Processing Charge, where applicable, does not influence editorial or peer-review decisions.
Where an APC applies, the applicable charge is stated on the journal's Article Processing Charges page.
Any applicable publication charge is independent of the scholarly assessment of the manuscript.
Authors should not be required to pay a publication fee merely to obtain peer review.
Following acceptance, the manuscript may undergo:
Authors may be asked to review the proofs and identify factual or production errors before publication.
Proof corrections should normally be limited to necessary corrections and should not introduce substantial new material unless approved by the editor.
Authors remain responsible for notifying PJEMS if they discover a significant error in their published article.
Depending on the nature of the issue, the journal may publish:
Authors should not withdraw manuscripts after peer review merely because they disagree with reviewer comments or editorial recommendations.
Requests for withdrawal should be submitted by the corresponding author and should provide a clear reason.
Where a manuscript has already incurred substantial editorial or production work, any applicable withdrawal conditions will be governed by the journal's publication policy.
Before clicking "Finish Submission", authors should confirm:
☐ The manuscript falls within PJEMS's scope.
☐ The manuscript is original.
☐ It is not under consideration elsewhere.
☐ All authors have approved the manuscript.
☐ Author names and affiliations are correct.
☐ The corresponding author has been identified.
☐ The abstract and keywords are included.
☐ References are complete and accurate.
☐ Tables and figures are properly numbered and cited.
☐ Ethical approval has been disclosed where applicable.
☐ Funding has been disclosed.
☐ Conflict of interest has been declared.
☐ Data availability has been addressed where applicable.
☐ AI use has been disclosed where applicable.
☐ Copyright permissions have been obtained where necessary.
☐ The manuscript complies with PJEMS formatting requirements.
☐ The anonymized manuscript contains no unnecessary identifying information where double-anonymous review applies.
Questions concerning manuscript submission should be directed to:
Editorial Office
Paraskevi Journal of Economics and Management Sciences (PJEMS)
Email: [INSERT OFFICIAL EDITORIAL EMAIL]
Journal Website: [INSERT PJEMS WEBSITE]